It was time to try a new method of grouping. While there is research that suggests pupils work well in constant groupings, I feel that this is only necessary in large group situations where introverted pupils feel safer in a known group. With 20 students I didn’t see the need for the ongoing sameness. Also, upon seeing some students emerge as group leaders and others become disengaged, I decided that we should try grouping by level. That way, we could set each level a different task related to the overall theme, which would hopefully stimulate everyone to the right level, while not boring anyone or leaving people confused about the stimulus.
Going into class the next day, we felt a ripple of excitement; maybe now with differentiation, we would see more engaged students for more of the available teaching time. Hopefully the slight differences in levels would jolt the students into seeking and retaining information where before they may have felt only discouragement that they were never going to be that good, or conversely that they had been stuck with a lower level student. In addition to the change in groups, we had also revised the short versions of the text that the students were given to read and work with according to level of difficulty. In this way, we hoped that all of the students could appreciate the text and its meaning without being overwhelmed or underworked.
NEH Director of Operations and Teacher Trainer